[patch] arptables respect LDFLAGS

Hi. The patch in attachment makes arptables respect LDFLAGS. Please,
apply. Thank you.

--
Peter.

Peter Volkov

2010-10-09 13:17:29 UTC

Hi again. What is the best way to contact arptables developers? My
previous patch was left without attention, should I resend it? In
attachment there are three fixes from debian:

1. arptables_save patch makes arp_tables don't resolve host names and
don't convert '*' interface names to any. Remove '*' interface names.
2. manpage patch removes old version from man page
3. is a patch from Jeroen van Wolffelaar to make arptables --proto-type
also accept hexadecimal inputs (ethernet protocol numbers are often
specfied in hex, not decimal), using standard strtol() behaviour (hex
iff starts with 0x).

Please, apply.

--
Peter.

Bart De Schuymer

2010-10-09 19:17:57 UTC

Hello Peter,

Patch 2 and 3 are committed.
For the '*' part of patch 1 I'd rather remove the -v usage in
arptables-restore. This will require fixing the reason why -v is used in
the first place. I wasn't aware this is due to a bug: the -i and -o
interfaces aren't printed unless -v is specified. I'll look into this.

cheers,
Bart

Post by Peter Volkov
Hi again. What is the best way to contact arptables developers? My
previous patch was left without attention, should I resend it? In
1. arptables_save patch makes arp_tables don't resolve host names and
don't convert '*' interface names to any. Remove '*' interface names.
2. manpage patch removes old version from man page
3. is a patch from Jeroen van Wolffelaar to make arptables --proto-type
also accept hexadecimal inputs (ethernet protocol numbers are often
specfied in hex, not decimal), using standard strtol() behaviour (hex
iff starts with 0x).
Please, apply.

--
Bart De Schuymer
www.artinalgorithms.be

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to ***@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Peter Volkov

2010-10-14 15:37:32 UTC

Hi Bart. Thank you for review/applying patches. Could you also apply
attached patch to fix not respecting LDFLAGS issue (very similar to one
I've sent you long time ago for ebtables :) )

--
Peter.

Post by Bart De Schuymer
Hello Peter,
Patch 2 and 3 are committed.
For the '*' part of patch 1 I'd rather remove the -v usage in
arptables-restore. This will require fixing the reason why -v is used in
the first place. I wasn't aware this is due to a bug: the -i and -o
interfaces aren't printed unless -v is specified. I'll look into this.
cheers,
Bart

Bart De Schuymer

2010-10-24 17:10:47 UTC

Applied.

Thanks,

Bart

Post by Peter Volkov
Hi Bart. Thank you for review/applying patches. Could you also apply
attached patch to fix not respecting LDFLAGS issue (very similar to o=

Post by Peter Volkov
I've sent you long time ago for ebtables :) )
--
Peter.
=D0=92 =D0=A1=D0=B1=D1=82, 09/10/2010 =D0=B2 21:17 +0200, Bart De Sch=

Post by Bart De Schuymer
Hello Peter,
Patch 2 and 3 are committed.
For the '*' part of patch 1 I'd rather remove the -v usage in=20
arptables-restore. This will require fixing the reason why -v is use=

d in=20

Post by Bart De Schuymer
the first place. I wasn't aware this is due to a bug: the -i and -o=20
interfaces aren't printed unless -v is specified. I'll look into thi=

Post by Bart De Schuymer
cheers,
Bart

Post by Peter Volkov
don't convert '*' interface names to any. Remove '*' interface name=

Post by Peter Volkov
2. manpage patch removes old version from man page
3. is a patch from Jeroen van Wolffelaar to make arptables --proto-=

type

Post by Peter Volkov
also accept hexadecimal inputs (ethernet protocol numbers are often
specfied in hex, not decimal), using standard strtol() behaviour (h=